Monday, November 26, 2007

Another Family Law Gladiator is Forced into the Coliseum in Maryland

Another Family Law Gladiator is Forced into the Coliseum in Maryland
Paul Sielski is on a blind date with destiny - and I think she just ordered the lobster
http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/11/26/another-family-law-gladiator-is-forced-into-the-coliseum-in-maryland/

Jim Untershine, GZS of LB, 11-25-07

Paul Sielski is a father's rights advocate who was ordered by a Maryland court to pay the mother of his child $3,500 per month (105% of his $40,000 net annual income). Sielski was warned by Judge Dwyer in a recent preliminary hearing: "You understand you can be put away for twenty years for Criminal Contempt, Mr. Sielski?", but Paul wants to represent himself , confront his complainant, and demands a Jury Trial. Everyone in the Maryland area is urged to attend this 'Unveiling of Communism in America' (Wed, 9am, 11-28-07, Fredrick County Circuit Courthouse, 100 West Patrick St, Frederick, Maryland 21701).

Paul was recently employed by Jim Gilchrist of the Minute Man Project to provide computer consultation and attend public events to convince Family Law reform groups and others to help resist the Mexican invasion. Paul was arrested in court on his way to testify in a lawsuit brought by Gilchrist after the Minute Man Project board members demanded an audit of financial accounting. Gilchrist contacted the Maryland Attorney General to facilitate Paul's arrest and extradition for failure to forward money to Maryland's Attorney General that Paul's employer withheld and never paid.

As reported on Gilchrist's website: "Paul Sielski, one of the defendants’ accomplices in the attempt to illegally commandeer the Minuteman Project, was arrested by the efficient work of an Orange County Sheriff’s Department Fugitive Task Force. He is expected to be extradited to Maryland soon for trial on a felony warrant. He faces up to 20 years in a Maryland prison if convicted for his alleged crimes."

Paul Sielski will soon be forced to defend himself in criminal court for an alleged omission. Paul will not be allowed to convince the jury that he did nothing wrong, because that is the crime he is accused of. Paul is in a situation where he must prove to the jury that it was not his turn to do something, and make a motion to reverse the charges both criminally and financially on the complainant (Maryland CSE).

Paul's case may revolve around his California employer who failed to contact California CSE as required by the "New Hires" mandate which would have alerted Maryland using the "Data Match" mandate to garnish Paul's pay using the "Wage Withholding" mandate that would be served on the Paul's new employer demanding all garnishments to be sent to California CSE, which would be distributed to Maryland CSE using the "Interstate" mandate. If California only complied with the Federal mandate, none of this might have happened.

California has never had a Federally approved accounting system since CSE agencies were forced into existence by Bill Clinton. The "New Hires" and "Data Match" mandates were publicly acknowledged as the main reason for Federal disapproval every year. The fraudulent accounting system incurs a 30% penalty on the 66% Federal funding of CSE operating costs that is provided to all the law abiding states. With California CSE operating costs at $1.1 billion per year the State taxpayers must pay $1 million a day even if CSE was legal, plus an additional $1 million a day because it's not. California CSE also refuses to use the "Enforce Wage Withholding" or "Employer Discrimination" mandates which would actually allow themselves to be useful. California CSE also refuses to use the "Distribute interest last" mandate, but seem eager to employ the "Double Count Interest collections" mandate in an attempt to reclaim the State taxpayer's penalty money from the $500 million national incentive pool (which seems to be more like a pond to California).

Andrew Tayrien of Arkansas has recently been prohibited from paying his children's mother any money for another 20 years. Hopefully Tayrien's family and friends will refuse to negotiate with these terrorists holding Andrew hostage - Never lie, never say 'no', never instigate issues, never refuse hostage release, never run away, and never pay. When Ron Paul restores our Constitutional government these hostages will be immediately freed.

As reported by The Benton County Daily Record: "Circuit Judge David Clinger recently sentenced Andrew Tayrien to 20 years in prison for non-support, a class B felony. Tayrien owes more than $50,000 in child support. He must serve at least one-sixth of the sentence before he is eligible for parole."

Incarcerating a parent for not paying child support is the Criminal Court actively and willfully denying the support and remedial care that the children deserve - which is exactly what the parent was convicted of. Even if current child support charges are reduced to nothing while the parent is imprisoned, the interest charges would exactly double the back child support principal after 20 years in 10% States like Maryland, Arkansas, and California. California adds Fascism to Communism by distributing all collections as interest owed - guaranteeing that the monthly interest charges will never decrease as long as the parent lives.

As published on the California CSE website: "Being in jail or prison does not automatically change your obligation to support your children. If you do not pay your child support, interest will be added to the unpaid amount." ... "Contact the local child support agency that is enforcing your order. Tell them that you are in jail and need a modification. They will review your case and tell you the results." ... "California's interest rate is 10% per year and is charged monthly to your balance of unpaid child support."

The American Bar Association (ABA) is seeking qualified applicants who wish to find fathers of children in the Welfare system, to seek out their relatives, and to tally any available resources. This 'Enticement Snare' operation is being funded by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and may entitle a lucky applicant "funding for a period of four years, with each award valued at approximately $500,000".

As published on the ABA website: "The focus of this project is a result of the federal Child and Family Services Reviews and the “What About the Dads?” report, which indicated that there is very little meaningful engagement occurring between the child welfare system and fathers. The QIC NRF promotes the importance of gaining more knowledge regarding the engagement of non-resident fathers and their children who are involved in the child welfare system." ... "Throughout this project, information gained from the QIC NRF will be disseminated through this Web site and to the Children’s Bureau, sub-grantees, child welfare agencies, private service providers, the courts, legal systems and other stakeholders."

A new company, Family Support Payment Corporation (FSPC), has announced plans to somehow shoulder the entire national Child Support debt of $102 billion, in exchange for the opportunity to extract the interest and penalties from child support obligators and their families. A child support award (which has no scientific justification) is a schedule of restitution for damages incurred by the family court in separating the children from the family breadwinner. Unpaid child support is money that never existed, was never earned, and was never really owed. FSPC will attempt to turn an arbitrary debt into a hard money debt to command more leverage in prosecuting collection using the new 20 year debtor's prison technique to pump up the growth of interest charges or extort a sizable ransom.

As published on the Family Support Payment Corp website: "You sign a contract that pays you all back support as well as the designated monthly payments required to satisfy your court order in exchange for the right of the Family Support Payment Corporation to collect the payments from the obligor parent." ... "The Family Support Payment Corporation makes child support payments from a Trust Account funded by collections from the obligor parent, U.S. Treasury bonds, interest, and fees generated by ancillary services." ... "The Family Support Payment Corporation can use any legal means necessary to collect child support and the obligor may be liable for interest and fees associated with the collection process."

The architects of the 'New World Order' may be well advised to stay closer to Socialism until parents are dumbed down a little more. Americans still believe that our country respects the Constitution and they all know Communism when we see it, hear it, and when something smells like it. You are not considered a Communist, until you acquiesce to Communism, or advocate others to do the same. I never thought I would ask this question, but "Where is Joe McCarthy when you need him?".

I urge everyone to immediately send a letter of support and encouragement to Paul Sielski. Just the volume of mail will let the other inmates know that Paul is fighting for all of us, and this kind of response may spread to the bench too. Contact Paul at: Frederick County Detention Center, Paul Sielski #037500, 7300 Marcie's Choice Lane, Frederick, MD 21704.

Jim Untershine, Long Beach, CA 90815, gndzerosrv@pavenet.net, www.gndzerosrv.com


Jim Untershine holds a BSEE from Mississippi State University and has 13 years experience in feedback control system design. Mr. Untershine is currently using the teachings of Werner Heisenberg and Henry David Thoreau to expose Family Law in California as the exploitation of children for money and the indentured servitude of heterosexual taxpayers who dare to raise children in this country.


2 comments:

Unknown said...

Deborah Courtney & Paul Sielski have VICTORY in court over Gilchrist's sidekick Stephen Eichler.

www.immigrationwatchdog.com/?p=7021
News from the MINUTEMAN PROJECT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact:Marvin L. Stewart
President
(562) 221-1820

Daniel F. Lula, Esq.
(949) 851-1100

Frivolous Defamation Suit Filed by Steven Eichler Against Patriots Deborah Courtney and Paul Sielski Stricken; Orange County Superior Court Finds Their Special Motion “Meritorious”

Santa Ana, Calif. – July 24, 2008 – The Orange County Superior Court today struck Steven Eichler’s defamation suit against Minutemen Deborah Courtney and Paul Sielski as a “strategic lawsuit against public participation.” Judge Kirk Nakamura permitted ample oral argument by both sides, and then granted the defendants’ motion, putting an end to Eichler’s frivolous suit against them.

Deborah Courtney is a member of the board of directors of Minuteman Project, Inc. and serves as the corporation’s treasurer. Paul Sielski is executive director of the corporation. Both have been embroiled in a dispute with Minuteman Project founder Jim Gilchrist regarding alleged financial irregularities within this high-profile nonprofit corporation.

On April 25, 2008, Gilchrist’s associate Eichler filed this defamation suit against Courtney and Sielski, as well as fellow patriots Barbara Coe, Chelene Nightingale of Save Our State, Brook Young of Immigration Watchdog, and Marvin Stewart of the Minuteman Project. Eichler claimed that the defendants had somehow “defamed” him by speaking out about his role in Gilchrist’s actions – especially Gilchrist’s transfer of the assets of the Minuteman Project corporation to a new corporation titled, “Jim Gilchrist’s Minuteman Project,” without board knowledge or approval.

Under the relevant law, defendants Courtney and Sielski are entitled to an award of the attorneys’ fees and costs they incurred in defending themselves against Eichler’s meritless suit.

The other defendants remain in the case; however, it is anticipated that most if not all will shortly file similar motions to strike. These defendants, too, expect to win and to be awarded their fees and costs.

The vindictive and retributive behavior against fellow patriots by Gilchrist and Eichler is deeply disturbing to many in the anti-illegal immigration movement. Today’s ruling should be heeded by them as a warning to engage others on the issues, not attempt to use litigation to squelch freedom and dissent.

The Minuteman Project was founded in early 2005 to secure America’s borders by means of civilian volunteer observers. Incorporated in mid-2005 as a Delaware nonprofit corporation, the Minuteman Project is governed by a board of directors under applicable law.

###

Unknown said...

MMP IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE Gilchrist Camp Looses 2nd Case in 1 week to Deborah Courtney & Paul Sielski in Gilchrist v Stewart

News from the MINUTEMAN PROJECT
www.immigrationwatchdog.com/?p=7050

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact:Marvin L. Stewart
President
(562) 221-1820

Daniel F. Lula, Esq.
(949) 851-1100

Second Frivolous Defamation Suit Against Patriots Deborah Courtney, Marvin Stewart and Paul Sielski Stricken; Jim Gilchrist’s Suit Follows the Same Path As That Of His Associate Stephen Eichler

Santa Ana, Calif. – July 29, 2008 – Judge Randell Wilkinson of the Orange County Superior Court today struck Minuteman founder Jim Gilchrist’s defamation suit against Minutemen Deborah Courtney, Marvin Stewart and Paul Sielski as a “strategic lawsuit against public participation.” Gilchrist’s suit against Barbara Coe, head of the California Coalition for Immigration Reform, was also stricken on the same basis.

Marvin Stewart and Deborah Courtney are members of the board of directors of Minuteman Project, Inc., and Paul Sielski is executive director of the corporation. Both have been embroiled in a dispute with Gilchrist regarding alleged financial irregularities within this high-profile nonprofit corporation.

On April 16, 2008, Gilchrist filed his defamation suit against these patriots, as well as Chelene Nightingale of Save Our State and Brook Young of Immigration Watchdog. Gilchrist claimed that the defendants had “defamed” him by speaking out about his transfer of the assets of the Minuteman Project corporation to a new corporation titled, “Jim Gilchrist’s Minuteman Project,” without board knowledge or approval.

Under the relevant law, defendants Stewart, Courtney and Sielski are entitled to an award of the attorneys’ fees and costs they incurred in defending themselves against Gilchrist’s meritless suit. Gilchrist has already been ordered by the Court to reimburse Ms. Coe over $9,100 in attorneys’ fees.

Gilchrist’s frivolous suit against fellow anti-illegal immigration activists is the second in less than a week to be dismissed. Last week, Gilchrist’s associate, Stephen Eichler, suffered the same ruling from Judge Kirk Nakamura. Eichler had filed a virtually identical defamation suit against the same defendants.

The vindictive and retributive behavior against fellow patriots by Gilchrist and Eichler is deeply disturbing to many in the anti-illegal immigration movement. Today’s ruling should be heeded by them as a warning to engage others on the issues, not attempt to use litigation to squelch freedom and dissent.

The Minuteman Project was founded in early 2005 to secure America’s borders by means of civilian volunteer observers. Incorporated in mid-2005 as a Delaware nonprofit corporation, the Minuteman Project is governed by a board of directors under applicable law.

###