Aaron Russo's Sequel to Andrew Jackson's Epitaph: 'I Killed the Bank II'

Aaron Russo managed to wake up America before succumbing to cancer on 08-24-07

http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/08/29/aaron-russos-sequel-to-andrew-jacksons-epitaph-i-killed-the-bank-ii/

Jim Untershine, GZS of LB, 08-28-07

The frontal assault on American families, that focus so much of our attention, may be a diversion from the massive assault on all Americans, that seems to be looming so large. The Divorce industry, Child Support Enforcement, and the Foster Care industry may soon be identified as only the trademark of the 'New World Order', which will soon erase our borders, divide our country, change our currency, and force us into slavery. Aaron Russo believed that an organized effort by a group of private bankers are attempting to take over our country – and I truly believe that too.

Russo promoted the rock acts 'Janis Joplin', 'The Grateful Dead', and managed 'Bette Midler'. He produced the popular movies 'Trading Places' with Eddy Murphy and 'The Rose' with Bette Midler. He ran for Governor of Nevada and received 30% of the vote. He produced the politically controversial films 'Mad as Hell' and 'America: from Freedom to Fascism'. Russo was the first US citizen to exonerate himself for the high crime of 'Misprision of Treason' (USC 18 2382) by publicly sharing conversations with Nick Rockefeller.

Aaron Russo's recent film 'America: from Freedom to Fascism' was the adult version of being told that there is no Santa Claus. The film revealed the beginning of the end of America as we knew it, and what this country has finally become. The most shocking details that are presented, are not secrets that were recently uncovered, but rather historical truths that were never pointed out in History class, divulged by our elected officials, or discussed by major media. The following are some of the quotes and occurrences that were presented in the film:

1816 - Thomas Jefferson informs John Tyler (1:03:57 ):

"If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation, and then by deflation, the banks and the corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their father's conquered ... I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies ... The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the Government, to whom it properly belongs."

1838 - Amschel Mayer Rothschild, a member of England's richest families, in a speech to a gathering of world bankers stated: (3:05)

"Let me control a peoples currency and I care not who makes their laws..."

1865 - Abraham Lincoln forged a "Monetary Policy" and a few weeks after it was introduced, Lincoln was assassinated: (1:01:01 )

"Government, possessing the power to create and issue currency and credit as money and enjoying the right to withdraw both currency and credit from circulation by taxation and otherwise, need not and should not borrow capital at interest [from the private banking system or their affiliates] as a means of financing government work and public enterprise. The government should create issue and circulate all the currency and credit needed to satisfy the spending power of the government and the buying power of consumers. The privilege of creating and issuing money is not only the supreme prerogative of government, but it is the government's greatest creative opportunity. By the adoption of these principles, the long-felt want for a uniform medium will be satisfied. The taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest, discounts, and exchanges. The financing of all public enterprises, the maintenance of stable government and ordered progress, and the conduct of the Treasury will become matters of practical administration. The people can and will be furnished with a currency as safe as their own government. Money will cease to be the master and become the servant of humanity. Democracy will rise superior to the money power."

1913 - Philander Knox, Secretary of State, falsely proclaimed that the 16th Amendment (that was passed by Congress in 1909) had finally been ratified by the necessary three-quarters of the states ensuring the constitutionality of unapportioned Federal income taxes: (1:22)

"The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration. Article I, section 9, of the Constitution was modified by amendment 16"

1913 - Woodrow Wilson signed the Federal Reserve Act into law which forced America to borrow their own money from a private bank and pay interest on the debt. Wilson published a book "The New Freedom: A Call For the Emancipation of the Generous Energies of a People" stating: (3:46)

"We are at the parting of the ways. We have, not one or two or three, but many, established and formidable monopolies in the United States. We have, not one or two, but many, fields of endeavor into which it is difficult, if not impossible, for the independent man to enter. We have restricted credit, we have restricted opportunity, we have controlled development, and we have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated, governments in the civilized world—no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and the duress of small groups of dominant men."

1920 - Josiah Stamp, former director of the Bank of England stated (1:37:50):

"Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The Bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create deposits, and with the flick of the pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take it away from them, and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear and they ought to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in. But, if you wish to remain the slaves of Bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create deposits."

1922 - John Hylan, New York Mayor, delivered a speech to the public:

"The real menace of our republic is this invisible government which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy length over City, State, and nation ... It seizes in its long and powerful tentacles our executive officers, our legislative bodies, our schools, our courts, our newspapers, and every agency created for the public protection ... To depart from mere generalizations, let me say that at the head of this octopus are the Rockefeller-Standard Oil interest and a small group of powerful banking houses generally referred to as the international bankers. The little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes."

1984 - Peter Grace of President Ronald Reagan's 'Grace Commission' reported: (18:58)

"With two-thirds of everyone's personal income taxes wasted or not collected, 100 percent of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the Federal debt and by Federal Government contributions to transfer payments. In other words, all individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services which taxpayers expect from their Government."

1985 - Ronald Reagan told all Americans in a television broadcast: (18:09)

"I believe that in both spirit and substance our tax system has come to be unAmerican. Death and taxes may be inevitable but unjust taxes are not."

1991 - David Rockefeller, private banker and member of the Council on Foreign Relations, congratulated the major media outlets for a job well done: (1:38:45)

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine, and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But now the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supra national sovereignty of an intellectually elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.

2006 - Aaron Russo concluded his film with the following conclusions and recommendations (1:41:10):

"Now that you do understand what happened in 1913, and how it is leading to a new world government, the future depends on you. Will you choose freedom or slavery? Stop living in fear of your government. Government is the servant - We are the master. So what are you going to do about it?

• Join together in civil disobedience. Be willing to take part in nationwide strikes, boycotts, and marches on Washington.
  
• Force Congress to use their legal authority to shut down the Federal Reserve. Government has the authority to issue money, without paying interest to the bankers, this will take away the power to control our government from the bankers.
  
• Only vote for candidates who have signed an affidavit to shut down the Federal Reserve system and stop world government.
  
• If you are in the military or law enforcement, remember, you swore an oath to defend the American Constitution. You did not swear an oath to promote world government. Honor your oath.
  
• Do not accept the national ID card, even if it is your driver's license.
  
• We must demand that the American people's gold be audited, and make certain that it has not been stolen. This asset must be returned to the American people.
  
• Abolish computer voting in the State where you live. Stop being good Democrats - Stop being good Republicans - Start being good Americans.
  
• And when the media starts telling you the country will fall apart if this is done - don't be fooled - this is just the Federal Reserve system trying to save itself. Squash it."
  

I believe that there is still time to preserve our national identity, protect our national borders, and insure the prosperity of our nation's families. I believe that those fighting for Family Law reform and those fighting for the restoration of our government can join together in a common cause. I believe that if Aaron Russo would have lived long enough to cast his vote for this country's next president, he would have voted for Ron Paul because he wants to kill the banks too.

STEAL THIS DOCUMENTARY

STEAL THIS DOCUMENTARY

What is the last thing that you KNOW is true?

http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/08/11/steal-this-documentary/

Jim Untershine, GZS of LB, 08-09-07

If you balance an awkward premise on Occam's razor - you may feel that the Divorce Industry is in collusion with radical feminism to deliver women to the Internal Revenue Service, and their children to the Foster Care Industry. A fresh look is necessary to establish a road map to peace in Middle America.

Many believe that America is still the land of the free, the home of the brave, and that our Constitutional rights are still being recognized and protected. Many believe that our elected representatives still have the power to determine this country's destiny, that major media is still independent of government and will promptly inform the public when government turns on it's citizens. I believe we still have time to make those beliefs true again.

"If you want to believe in it, then believe in it. Just because something isn't true doesn't mean you can't believe in it. Sometimes, the things that may or may not be true are the things that a man needs to believe in the most. That people are basically good, and that honor, courage and virtue mean everything. Power and money - money and power mean nothing. That good always triumphs over evil. And that true love never dies. You remember that - and whether it is true or not - you'll see that those things are the only things worth believing in." (the movie 'Second Hand Lions')

Phyllis Schlafly may provide her reaction to recent revelations regarding the hijacking of feminism by those paid to deliver women and mothers to the IRS in the name of freedom or in the name of their own children. The devastating effects of the Violence Against Women Act that has somehow grown so huge it is now being imposed on the rest of the world. Schlafly can also discuss her own battle against illegal immigration, selling US patents to other countries, etc.

Wendy McElroy may turn her back on FoxNews to lend credibility to the negative effect radical feminism has had on women who wish to seek equality. The insatiable appetite of the Foster Care programs in snatching children from both their biological parents without proving abuse. McElroy can elaborate on the family law injustices forced on breadwinning parents (regardless of gender) in Family Court

Rachel Allen of the National Organization of women can fill us in regarding the reasons behind "The Family Court Report in California". Why NOW believed successful women in their organization were being separated from their children in Family Court. Why women who get pregnant fear for their life and why women who follow their divorce advice all end up on welfare. Allen could be asked 'What did she know - and when did she stop knowing it?" regarding NOW being funded by the US government to force all women to pay taxes.

Deborah Courtney from the Minute Man Project may update us on their progress in stopping the Mexican invasion. The reasons for changes in leadership, why her husband was arrested for not paying child support, and why her husband is still in jail. Provide any reasons to believe that our government has gotten the message that all US citizens have the right to defend America.

Stephen Baskerville, the President of the American Coalition of Fathers and Children (ACFC) , will expose the political apparatus that has cast a pestilence on Families in America for the last 30 years. The brutal war that fathers must wage to stay in the lives of their own children. The deaths attributed to Family Law injustice and the misdirected anguish provoked by the Divorce Industry. Coming in Spring 2007 from Cumberland House Publishing: "Taken Into Custody: The War Against Fathers, Marriage, and the Family"

Taken Into Custody is the most comprehensive exposé yet published by a major publishing house on the depredations of the divorce industry. I say this conscious that I am standing on the shoulders of others. This book was made possible by the pioneering efforts of authors who have preceded me (all of whose work it draws upon): Jed Abraham, Sanford Braver, Warren Farrell, Jeffery Leving, David Levy, Melanie Phillips, Dean Tong, Cathy Young, plus Richard Doyle, Bai Macfarlane, Judy Parejko, Robert Seidenberg, and others (including, most recently, Phyllis Schlafly in the revised paperback edition of her latest book). Yet because they were breaking ground, most of these writers were either pressured to tone down their language or forced to self-publish. This is the first book from a major publisher that has been permitted to speak the unvarnished truth about the divorce machinery: its destruction of families, its violations of the Constitution, its disregard for due process of law, its voracious appetite for children, parents, and families. This is no tirade however but a thoroughly documented study of a previously neglected abuse by a credentialed political scientist. The result is a major breakthrough in exposing the greatest civil rights abuse of our time and the most repressive government machine ever created in the United States.

Robert Williams of Policy Studies Inc (PSI) can describe his company's contribution to the Child Support Enforcement (CSE) agencies in 49 states, Canada, Australia, the Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico. A description of what CSE agencies are allowed to do to parents who don't pay as ordered (as described in USC 42 666). Williams can dazzle us with the various schemes each state uses to arrive at the child support amount parents are ordered to pay or are put in jail if they can't. Compare the Child Support Guideline in California with the amounts reported to Congress by the Clearinghouse for Child Support Enforcement Statistics. Draw on his company's experience in California to answer why CSE only receives 33% of their operating costs from the Federal government while all other states receive 66%. Williams may pontificate on the billions of dollars that are reportedly uncollected by parents across the country and why PSI should not be blamed.

Elaine Sorensen from the Urban Institute can explain why California CSE has failed to collect child support from parents. Why California CSE is allowed to disburse collections from parents as the interest on the debt that was assigned by Family Court. Explain how support collections are supposed to be disbursed by CSE. Sorensen may shed some light on how states are allowed to double the collections disbursed as interest since interest, welfare, and Foster Care collections must be distributed last. Provide information as to how each state is paid performance incentives based on CSEs child support collections from parents. Provide any possible reasons why their report on child support collectability is not available on the Internet anymore.

Maureen Pirog/Good from the Institute for Family and Social Responsibility (FASR) can illuminate us on the importance of fraudulently diminishing the reported child support awards across all states except Indiana. Explain the benefits of falsely presenting Indiana to the Ways and Means Committee as possessing the most aggressive child support guideline in the nation. Pirog may also provide insight as to where their child support data came from and why it has never been updated since 1997.

Glenn Sacks, Michael McCormick, Dave Usher, Richar' Farr, Roger Gay, Kathleen Parker, Cornell Smith, Michael Galluzzo, Alec Baldwin, Jim Carrey, and many others could provide more details of how far our government is willing to go to thin out our numbers, control more taxpayers, and steal our children.

The Family Law AniMatrix (for the kids) which places the characters that were just interviewed into a movie teenagers already love.

Replace the 'spoon' with 'law' and replace the 'battery' with 'money' and then 'THE MATRIX' becomes 'FAMILY LAW'

"Do not try to bend the law, that's impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth. There is no law. Then you will see that it is not the law that bends, it is only yourself."

"We came to realize the obviousness of the truth; What is Family Law? --- Control, it's a state-operated dream world, designed to keep you under control, in order to turn a human being into money."

Family Law Reloaded: Problem Identification

Family Law Revolution: Level of Involvement

Family Law AniMatrix: Corrective Action (Conclusion withheld until release)

The Family Law Illuminati

The Family Law Illuminati

Parents are urged to vote ‘NO CONFIDENCE’ in 2008

http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/08/02/the-family-law-illuminati/

Jim Untershine, GZS of LB, 08-02-07

Aaron Russo’s film “Mad As Hell” seemed to get the attention of those planning to cleanse America. Approached by a member of the world’s ruling elite – Russo was asked if he wished to join up. This 'Voice of the One True Potentate' prophesied a ‘Event’ that we commonly refer to as ‘Nine Eleven’ and shared a vivid description of it’s aftermath. The Grand Pooba’s messenger also explained that the ‘Women’s Lib’ movement was intended to finally enable them to tax the other half the population and to get the kids at school at an early age so they could indoctrinate the kids how to think, which breaks up their family, so the kids look at the state as their family. Russo was told that membership would allow him to enjoy a form of diplomatic immunity from prosecution or persecution that will soon be targeting all Americans who dare to raise children in this country.

The series of unfortunate events that befell American families, preceded the events of ‘Nine Eleven’. A system of control and financial destruction was rolled out and activated to enslave all parents in the name of their own children. Forcing dependent parents into the work force (to allow them to collect welfare) allows the 'New World Order' to have a new source of income and another entry into the IRS database. The critical step in driving a parent to welfare, however, was to drive the family breadwinner to unemployment by imposing a debt that was impossible to pay. With the Rockefellers funding Radical Feminism and the CIA funding Gloria Steinem and "Ms Magazine" - American women were coaxed into allowing the sinister chain reaction to begin by simply walking into Family Court. Mothers were promised a lucrative tax-free income from the family's breadwinner for up to 18 years, a government agency that would guarantee uninterrupted payment, and protection from any retaliation from the victim of circumstance being targeted. This 'bait and switch' confidence game continues to be used on many dependent parents in America who are either too gullible or too greedy.

To understand the philosophy of slavery, we are forced to revisit our nation's history. Slave owners were instructed by experts from abroad: To successfully control generations of slaves, the most resistant males must have each leg tied to horse, lit on fire, and the horses beaten until the slave was ripped apart. This spectacle would be meaningless unless the women and their children were forced to watch. The women would realize that the father of their children was powerless to protect them and they would teach their children the same. The new generation of slaves would be taught to rely on their master for their security and protection.

The same philosophy of slavery is being used today by Civil and Criminal courts across the country. But the target is not necessarily the Father - it is the family breadwinner. The parent who earns the most money will be separated from the family and forced to pay an arbitrarily outrageous amount of money. The system will then rub salt in their wounds, kick them while they are down, sucker punch them, and hit them below the belt, to force them keep paying or the system will put the slave in debtor's prison. The Family Law spectacle (not surprisingly) is played out before the breadwinner's family and even the public, but never in front of a jury (since they are the only people who could possibly stop it).

The 'Carpet Baggers' associated with the construction of the New World Order can only attempt to achieve the success enjoyed by Robert Williams and his minions from Policy Studies Inc. (PSI) of Denver, Colorado. The arrogance of PSI was reflected by their company slogan (prior to my written testimony to the Ways and Means Committee) which read: "Do socially useful work, have fun, and make money". PSI bragged of structuring Child Support policy in "49 states, Canada, Australia, the Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico" and claimed to "provide an environment which allowed their employees to take risks without being punished for mistakes".

The 'Scalawags' associated with the construction of the New World Order can only attempt to achieve the success enjoyed by Maurine Pirog/Good, Catherine Byers, and Marilyn Klotz from the Institute for Family and Social Responsibility (FASR) of Bloomington, Indiana. Paid by the taxpayers as the Clearinghouse for Child Support Enforcement Statistics, they submitted a report to the Congress that essentially claimed that the child support guidelines in every state were less than the amount their family would receive on welfare. Table 8-2 of the Greenbook has survived republication since 1997 and lawmakers at the federal level have no idea of the actual Family Law spectacle that their constituents are forced to endure.

Meanwhile, the employees of the agencies that are funded by the taxpayers are allowed to organize and lobby Congress to increase their power, their payoff, and their prosperity. The parents who are victimized by this unlawful scam are forced to pay taxes which forces them to pay for their own demise. Aaron Russo’s recent film “America From Freedom to Fascism” not only provides American parents with a solid gold reason why they should stop funding the opposition - it also reveals how. When asked to do all the wrong things, for all the wrong reasons, you have every right to prefer not to.

A vote for 'NO CONFIDENCE" in 2008 is a vote for no taxes, the end of organized crime, and the restoration of the American government that has been hijacked by rich terrorists dressed as Klansmen in the Bohemian Grove, rich terrorists wearing lambskin aprons in palaces in Europe, and wannabes that masturbate in coffins at Yale. If American parents wait much longer, the New World Order's policy of 'thinning out their numbers' may change to a policy of 'they were coming right for us'.